Arkivo vs ASC Technologies

Arkivo vs ASC Technologies

Excellent multi-channel Teams compliance recording, but heavy and centered on ASC's control plane. Arkivo is the cloud-agnostic, customer-owned archive layer.

The short answer

ASC's Recording Insights is a Teams-native compliance-recording suite spanning voice, video, screen, chat, and meetings, popular in financial services and public safety, on Azure. Arkivo focuses on a customer-owned, cloud-agnostic archive with in-tenant AI and a NICE+Genesys timeline. The difference is breadth-of-channel versus ownership-of-archive. Pick Arkivo to own and govern the data.

Arkivo vs ASC Technologies at a glance

Arkivo compared with ASC Technologies across key capabilities
CapabilityArkivoASC Technologies
Runs in your own cloud — you own the storage
Yes
No
Multi-cloud (AWS · Azure · GCP · private)
Yes
Partial
AI runs inside your tenant — no data egress
Yes
No
Cross-vendor caller timeline (NICE + Genesys)
Yes
No
Byte-verified, zero-loss migration
Yes
No
Bring your own keys / CMK
Yes
Partial
100% automated QA inside your tenant
Yes
Partial
Legal hold, retention & lifecycle
Yes
Yes
Immutable, exportable audit log
Yes
Partial
White-label / multi-tenant
Yes
No
Transparent flat pricing (no per-TB tax)
Yes
No
Fully air-gapped option
Yes
Partial
Included Partial / limited Not available
The core difference

Their cloud, or your cloud

ASC Technologies is a deep, Teams-native compliance-recording platform: it captures voice, video, screen, chat, and meetings, layers QM, analytics, and translation on top, and is well established in financial services and public safety. It offers on-prem, cloud, and hybrid deployment, which gives it real flexibility around where recordings live.

Arkivo is narrower by design and aimed at a different job. ASC's strength is recording the widest possible range of Teams and UC channels under its own compliance control plane. Arkivo's strength is owning the archive: it takes contact-center recordings — including those originating in NICE CXone and Genesys Cloud — and lands them in the customer's own AWS, Azure, GCP, or private cloud, with in-tenant AI and bring-your-own-keys.

The hybrid/on-prem options mean ASC can be partially air-gapped and can keep data on customer infrastructure, so on a couple of axes it's a genuine 'partial' rather than a flat no. What it doesn't do is run as a cloud-agnostic, customer-tenant archive with a cross-vendor caller timeline and byte-verified migration — which is precisely Arkivo's lane.

Credit where it's due

Where ASC Technologies is strong

An honest read — these are real strengths worth weighing in your decision.

  • Deep, certified Microsoft Teams and UC compliance recording.
  • True multi-channel capture — voice, video, screen sharing, chat, and meetings.
  • Strong pedigree in regulated financial services and public safety.
  • Built-in translation alongside transcription and QM.
  • Flexible deployment: cloud, on-prem, or hybrid.

Your migration path

Where ASC is the system of record for Teams compliance recordings, Arkivo can sit alongside it as the long-term, customer-owned archive. You deploy Arkivo into your own cloud, ingest historical recordings and metadata (from ASC and from NICE/Genesys sources), and run byte-level verification so the archived corpus is provably intact. In-tenant AI then handles transcription, sentiment, and automated QA on the archive, and Arkivo unifies caller history across NICE and Genesys — leaving ASC to do what it does best at the live Teams-recording layer.

Pricing compared

ASC is enterprise-licensed and quote-based, scoped by users, channels, and deployment model, and bundles its own processing and storage. Arkivo charges a flat platform fee and stores recordings on your own cloud at commodity rates, so archive costs scale with cheap storage rather than enterprise per-channel licensing. For organizations sitting on large multi-year recording sets, owning the archive in-tenant is typically far cheaper at the TB scale than retaining everything under an enterprise recording license.

See the interactive TCO calculator →
Questions, answered

Arkivo vs ASC Technologies — FAQ

Last verified June 2026. This comparison reflects publicly available information and is offered in good faith; competitors change quickly, so re-verify before a purchase decision. Sources: ASC Technologies official site · Arkivo competitive research.

Your cloud · Your keys · Your data

Own your recordings. Keep the experience.

See the control plane live in minutes, or talk to us about migrating off NICE or Genesys into the cloud you already trust. No rip-and-replace, no lost calls.

Launch the live app

No data migration required to evaluate · Your cloud, your keys, your data